A new study presented at the American Thoracic Society 2007 International Conference this weekend suggests that women who eat apples and fish during pregnancy may reduce the risk of their children developing asthma or allergic disease.
The SEATON study, conducted at the University of Aberdeen, UK, found that the children of mothers who ate the most apples were less likely to ever have wheezed or have doctor-confirmed asthma at the age of 5 years, compared to children of mothers who had the lowest apple consumption. Children of mothers who ate fish once or more a week were less likely to have had eczema than children of mothers who never ate fish.
The study did not find any protective effect against asthma or allergic diseases from many other foods, including vegetables, fruit juice, citrus or kiwi fruit, whole grain products, fat from dairy products or margarine or other low-fat spreads.
The researchers studied 1212 children born to women who had filled out food questionnaires during their pregnancy. When the children were 5 years old, the mothers filled out a questionnaire about the children’s respiratory symptoms and allergies, as well as a questionnaire about their child’s food consumption.
The children were also given lung function and allergy tests. Previous studies in the same children have found evidence for protective effects of vitamin E and D and zinc during pregnancy in reducing the risk of children’s wheeze and asthma, notes researcher Saskia Willers, M.Sc. of Utrecht University in the Netherlands. If the new results are confirmed, she says, “recommendations on dietary modification during pregnancy may help to prevent childhood asthma and allergy.”
Willers concludes that at least until age 5, a mother’s diet during pregnancy might be more influential on a child’s respiratory health than the child’s own diet. She notes that further study of this group of children will be needed to see whether the association with the mothers’ diet declines in older children, and if mothers’ and their childrens’ diets interact in older children.
Willers suggests that the beneficial effect of apples may come from powerful antioxidants called flavonoids, while fish’s protective effect may come from omega-3 fatty acids, which other studies have suggested have a protective effect on the heart and may have a protective effect in asthma. “Other studies have looked at individual nutrients’ effect on asthma in pregnancy, but our study looked at specific foods during pregnancy and the subsequent development of childhood asthma and allergies, which is quite new,” Willers says. “Foods contain mixtures of nutrients that may contribute more than the sum of their parts.”
I CRAVED apples when I was pregnant with my son. A friend of mine, who is a homeopathic doctor, told me that apples are loaded with benefits for the baby.
Pregnant women should be careful what kinds of fish they consume. Many varieties including tuna, shark and mackerel come with heavy mercury warnings that can harm the baby. It is recommended to have fish regularly, but avoid the bigger varieties. The longer they are in the water the more time they have to absorb the mercury in the water.
Tilapia, trout and wild salmon are all great alternatives.
